The focusing points are nice to have, but it's not as big of a deal as you might think. But I'd rather have one card slot and have a new camera.
When I had the 5D Mark iii I hardly ever kept the other card in there. We shot weddings, music videos, indie films, etc with the 5D Mark ii before the 5D mark iii came out. Even the 5D Mark ii didn't have two card slots. Two card slots is nice, but that's something new really. Of course I'm using a sharp lens as well. When I can, it's still really razor sharp. Focus and recompose isn't an issue for portraits, anything past 50mm, even at 2.8 I've done test of focusing and recomposing vs having the focus point right on the subject and even at 1:1 I can barely tell a difference, usually I can't tell a difference.
I have owned the 5D Mark iii and 6D, the 6D is lighter, the focus point seems way faster, especially if you got a good lens. But it's also possible it does, which is why Canon does their test and puts their number on there. It's even possible the shutter doesn't fail 10 years from now. I take pictures a good bit and my shutter count doesn't go up each year as much as I thought it would in my head. Because of this, he gets cameras very cheap because he doesn't care what the shutter count is. He claims that his test show the shutter can go way over the estimation and usually does. I have a friend who works in research for camera technology.
0 kommentar(er)
